Solano Real Estate Scene: Vote yes on Proposition 5, no on Proposition 10

By Jim Porter

Hey, readers. I am writing a follow-up to a column I wrote in September about how the real estate community is supporting a yes vote on Proposition 5 and a no vote on Proposition 10.

I have not received any pushback from my readers, clients, friends and family on Proposition 5 because it really helps senior citizen homeowners move down to smaller homes with less maintenance and keep their low property taxes from their departing residence they purchased 20 to 40 years ago. To me, Proposition 5 is a no-brainer because it helps the middle class and the seniors who are living on low incomes.

Who doesn’t want to help senior citizens?

I am in the middle. My 88-year-old dad has always voted Republican and my 82-year-old mom is a Democrat and they raised seven kids in San Francisco in the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s. I was the second oldest, so me and all my brothers and sisters witnessed rent control in the late ’70s through the ’80s in our beloved San Francisco and now, even though we loved growing up in the blue-collar sunset district of San Francisco, only my CPA brother still lives in the city.

My parents retired to Santa Rosa and the rest of us kids, like 90 percent of all our city friends, have moved away because of San Francisco’s affordability.

Government rent control has not worked there, and it won’t work here, and taxpayers should not have to pay more in taxes to pay for more government to control landlords.

Fifty-two percent of all Americans 55 and older have nothing more than Social Security lined up for retirement, a fact I wrote about earlier this year in an unrelated column, so when a reader sent me a message a couple of weeks ago about the two- or three-year waiting period for low-income apartments in Solano County, I felt out of respect for her I would respond to her comments.

She is not alone, and her concerns are valid because even if there was rent control like there is in San Francisco, if you only make $1,700 per month, there is no way you can afford to pay up to $1,300 per month rent, which is considered affordable rent in Solano County.

I do not have any brilliant solutions to the plight of senior citizens who have a low income and are renting. I have many solutions for super senior folks who own homes with $200,000 worth of equity and limited income via moving down in price, a reverse mortgage or selling the house and moving out of the state or using the proceeds and building a granny flat on their kid’s property.

Lately, I have seen a big increase in families pooling their resources and buying houses together. For example, grandma and grandpa sell their house and take the tax-free capital gains of up to $500,000 and their baby boomer daughter and son-in-law sells their house and they combine their resources to buy a house with two master bedrooms or a home on 2.5 acres with a main house and an accessory unit for the seniors – or vice versa.

The other thing I can do is encourage every adult I know that homeownership is critical to financial security in America because inflation is a reality. Rents, like milk, bread and even water, will be more expensive in 30 years than they are today.

My hard-working parents, with a little help from my late grandpa, somehow sent six of the seven kids to Catholic school. Our oldest brother was autistic and went to a special school, so guilt is part of my life and I feel terrible for poor people, especially senior citizens and children. Like many of my fellow real estate professionals and local businesses, we try to help through charitable contributions and I personally promote financial literacy.

Yes, some landlords might be jerks, but I swear most are not and all are regulated through fair housing laws and tenants’ rights laws that are already in place.

 

All Things Real Estate: Unmarried people buying property together should have agreement

Lebanon

Erik Taylor to Preston W. La Barre, 617 Union St., $112,000.

Goshen Mortgage Reo LLC to Roman Maleszewski, 1013 Maple St.,  $25,000.

Josephine R. Heagy to Luis Figueroa-Vargas and Yaritza Lopez, 217 E. Cumberland St., 482,000.

Ysabel and Joseph Pariti to Crystal K. Bashore, 1540 Rita Lane, $184,000.

Earl K. Pyles Jr. to RMRR Properties, 220 S. Fifth St., $46,000.

Lindsay L. Goodhand to Julia R. Lopez, 303 E. Elm St., $95,000.

Fannie Mae aka Federal National Mortgage Association to Jane Barrick and Stefen Aparicio, 724 S. Third Ave., $81,000.

Francis J. and Suzanne H. Churgai to William and Hillary J. Sanchez, 20 S. Third St., $127,000.

North Lebanon Township

Ray L. and Laura Weaver to Jordan D. Weaver, 110 Sherri Drive, $215,000.

Landmark Homes at Sweetbriar Inc., Landmark Builders Inc. dba Landmark Homes to Kathleen B. Mols, property on Briar Rose Avenue, $297,700.

Fannie Mae aka Federal National Mortgage Association to Logan J. Brown, 2115 Hill St., $139,300.

Landmark Homes at Sweetbriar Inc., Landmark Builders Inc., to David A. and Janet L. Bradley, 937 Snapdragon Court, $56,450.

Ashley B. Kelly to Saritzia Arroyo and Kevin Martinez, 2445 Union Canal Drive, $174,900.

Mary L. Strangarity Estate to Robert P. Haldeman and Barbara A. Swingholm, 913 Poplar Lane, $175,000.

West Lebanon Township

Donald C. and Marsha A. Graby to Ilyana L. Guinn, 1907 Scull St., $92,000.

Cornwall

Gary L. Schlegel to Thomas E. and Mabel K. Davis, property on Alden Way, $330,000.

Rick L. and Monica L. Clay to Michael T. Ginder, 401 Dogwood Drive, $112,500

Mount Gretna

Margaret A. O’Neil to Gerald and Emily Good, 114 Lancaster Ave., $299,500.

West Cornwall Township

Christopher J. and Katrina L. Kelly to Paul W. Jr. and Faye A. Maulfair, 206 4th St., $165,000.

Golden Trail Partners to Doug M. Hoover, 400 Dogwood Lane, $245,000.

North Cornwall Township

Emilio G. Pantojas to Natalie Martei-Rosario and Jose Hernandez-Velez, 126 S. Second St., $104,900.

Keith A. and Alyson A. Konowal to Cole R. and Tracy Hackert, 916 Cross Creek Court $414,000.

John A. Harpold to Fiordaliza Burgos, 132 Northwood Court, $123,000.

Annville

Robert Strong to Stephanie J. Kish, 1332 E. Walnut St., $171,100.

Brian K. Hostetter to Bonnie M. and Gordon G. Gerber Jr., Amy J. and Mateo G. Coranado, 441 E. Main St., $128,750.

South Annville Township

Benjamin F. Sims to Brent Shearer, 1043 Mount Wilson Road, $42,500.

Douglas J. Meyer to Elliott F. Garney and Eileen C. Bell, property on Spruce Street, $249,000.

North Annville Township

Clifford L. Rasp Estate to Donald R. Blauch, 865 Laurel Grove Road, $149,100.

Jozo and Dijana Geljic to Ryan M. Dinunzio, 426 W. Cherry St., $166,000.

Brian R. and Melissa Jones to Joseph E. and Alyson Urban, 149 Orchard Hill Drive, $280,000.

South Londonderry Township

John T. and Sherry B. Linderman to Greanne G. Gramling, 32 Cobblestone Drive, $324,300.

Thomas Harold and Colleen L. Miller Revocable Living Trust to Steve L. Klick, 239 Lawn Road, $123,000.

North Londonderry Township

Cindy K. Stuart to Brittany A. and Ryan N. Nye, 27 Villa lane, $228,000.

Selehattin and Bulson Emlek to Patrick C. and Kristin M. Sweeney, 210 Oxford Road, $294,900.

George D. and Claudia C. Laubach to Calvin W. and Cynthia A. Dubrock, 135 Auburn Drive, $503,000

East Hanover Township

Francesco Randazzo to Francesco D. Randazzo, 1122 Gravel Hill Road, $250,000.

Byler Management Company to James M. Herr, 75 and 87 Lindley Murray Road, $395,000.

Brenda L. Wolfe, Bryon C. Wolf, Robert S. Wolf, property on Blacks Bridge Road, $65,000.

Jonestown

Jesse D. Markle to Kimberly A. Boltz, 149 Twin Creeks Drive, $235,000.

Matthew S. and Bethany S. Houser to Janelle E. Hess and Edward M. Alferez, 350 Swatara Creek Drive, $139,900.

Douglas L. and Leslie D. Wilson to James Henderson, 116 Creek View Drive, $232,000.

Swatara Township

Joette Weikel to Frank L. and Kandice M. DiGiorgio, 2062 Grace Ave., $194,900.

Bethel Township

Jeffrey R. and Heidi G. Brubaker to Daniel J. and Janice M. Litzenberger, 200 Snow Drive, $500,000.

Jackson Township

Frances M. Ficco Estate to Samuel H. Brandt and Kenneth P. Brown, 4 Mantis Court, $212,000.

Lowell M. Ebling to Estate to Michael B. and Cynthia L. Harnish, 19 S. Fairland Ave., $138,000.

V. Dean and Vera N. Stump to Matthew H. and Ellen N. Eberly, 21 Greble Road, $178,000.

James J. and Linda M. Martin to Kenneth D. and Irene H. Groff, 105 Pleasant Drive, $170,000.

Trudy J. Miller to Anthony D. Alessi, 45 Scenic Drive, $165,000.

Heidelberg Township

Eugene K. Martin and Linda S. Martin to Edna S. Hurst-Shank Revocable Living Trust, The Glenn R. Shank Revocable Living Trust Agreement, 157 Linda Sue Lane, $160,000.

Myerstown

Daryl G. Martin to Christopher S. Boger, 58 W. Main Ave., $142,500.

Millcreek Township

Peter B. Shirk Living Trust, Naomi H. Shirk Living Trust, to Thomas J. Snyder and Tammy Snyder. 16 Hillside Drive, $250,000.

Maryland and Delaware Long & Foster group makes Inc. 5000

The Maryland and Delaware Group of Long & Foster Real Estate has been named by Inc.magazine as one of the fastest growing companies in the nation.

The Salisbury, Maryland-based team ranked 3,196 on the 37thannual Inc. 5000 list. The 2018 Inc. 5000 is ranked according to each company’s revenue growth since 2014. The Maryland and Delaware Group of Long & Foster experienced a three-year revenue growth of 123 percent.

Brandon Brittingham leads the Maryland and Delaware Group in the Delmarva region and Douglas Gardiner oversees the team’s operations in western Maryland. They have recently added a Southern Maryland office in Waldorf, Maryland.

The group also plans to open an office in Delaware.

“Our mission a few short years ago was to create a real estate team that focused on providing the best possible experience to any buyer or seller,” said Brittingham. “Being named to this prestigious list is a testament to customers responding to the service we have provided for their real estate needs.”

Complete results of the Inc. 5000, including company profiles and an interactive database that can be sorted by industry, region and other criteria, can be found at inc.com/inc5000or in the September issue of Inc. magazine.

Former Ford engine plant in Brook Park, 195 acres, goes up for sale

Ford Brook Park

BROOK PARK, Ohio — More than six years after Ford Motor Co. shuttered its Cleveland Engine Plant No. 2, the automaker has decided to sell the massive complex and adjacent land.

The 195-acre property, at 18300 Snow Road in Brook Park, hit the marketThursday.

Just east of Cleveland Hopkins International Airport and touched by freeways and rail lines, the site includes the 1.7 million-square-foot engine plant, which ended its 57-year run in spring 2012, and land where a mammoth casting plant once stood.

In a market where such large sites are a rarity – and at a time when industrial vacancy is strikingly low, especially for high-quality buildings – the Ford property is likely to attract a flurry of interest from real estate speculators, developers and companies in need of manufacturing or distribution space.

Ford’s defunct Walton Hills stamping plant, on 111 acres near the Hard Rock Rocksino and Northfield Park, went up for sale earlier this year. Now Ford is evaluating a dozen offers for that property, most of them above the advertised price of $9 million.

“I’ve never seen a market like this,” said Howard Lichtig, a CBRE, Inc., vice president who is handling both the Walton Hills and Brook Park listings for Ford with colleague Michael Toth. “There’s a ton of velocity, and there’s very little product. And those are great market conditions if you’re a seller.”

The listing for the Brook Park property doesn’t include an asking price, and Lichtig would not throw out any numbers. But based on other recent land sales in the area, it wouldn’t be out of the question to see the Ford plant go for $20 million, or more.

Ford couldn’t immediately be reached for comment Thursday.

Public officials and civic leaders greeted the listing with relief.

They’ve been waiting anxiously for Ford, which transferred the property from its manufacturing division over to its land division for sale earlier this year, to make a move. Ford still employs 1,180 people at Cleveland Engine Plant No. 1 in Brook Park, according to the city, and is hanging onto some land between the operating and vacant facilities as an apparent buffer or possible expansion site.

“This comes along once in a generation, as far as I’m concerned,” Scott Adams, the city’s economic-development commissioner, said of the opportunity to market such a prominent site.

The city is hoping to woo one large industrial user, or a handful of users, to the property.

Under a long-running program, the site qualifies for 15 years of full property-tax abatement on improvements, such as renovations to the existing plant or construction of new buildings. And Brook Park is willing to consider other financial incentives, such as city job-creation tax credits, and to help with efforts to secure county and state money for cleaning up the site or bringing jobs there, Adams said.

The former automotive plant, close to workers and public transportation, also could play into broader discussions about establishing a multi-city innovation district and jobs hub, called an aerozone, near the airport and NASA Glenn Research Center.

Vince Adamus, vice president of real estate and business development for the Greater Cleveland Partnership, the metropolitan chamber of commerce, has sent emails to Brook Park and Ford over the years about statewide leads on companies looking for large manufacturing buildings or industrial properties. Those businesses ultimately didn’t land in Northeast Ohio.

Now, he said, the region has a compelling site to pitch in such contests.

The chamber hopes both the Brook Park and Walton Hills properties will remain industrial, though Walton Hills rezoned its stamping-plant site a few years ago to encourage mixed-use development. That zoning change wouldn’t necessarily rule out an industrial project.

While discussing the potential of the Brook Park site, real estate brokers mentioned the transformation of a former Chrysler stamping-plant property in Twinsburg into a business park. In that case, developers razed the 1.8 million-square-foot plant and have been replacing it with new warehouses and distribution buildings.

Though portions of the former Ford plant in Brook Park also could be demolished, it’s possible a company might come along and fill the entire thing.

“There are a couple owner-users that had stepped up in prior discussions that would want to keep Walton Hills intact and that may also be candidates for Brook Park, in which case they would keep Brook Park intact,” Lichtig said. “This is not a functionally obsolescent building.”

FROZEN IN TIME Inside the 1930s house on sale for £230,000 that hasn’t changed for 80 YEARS

A HOME for sale in Wales has the same authentic decor as when it was built 80 years ago.

The detached home in Cross Hands, near Llanelli, was built in 1939 and has changed very little since that time – even the furniture is from that era.

 This house, built in the 1930s, has been frozen in time

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
This house, built in the 1930s, has been frozen in time

It has remained in the same family since the keys were first handed over in 1939, but the current owners have reluctantly put the property, called Heol Bryngwili, on sale for £230,000 so they can downsize.

The house has many art deco features such as panelled crittal windows and a first floor balcony.

Originally the house may have had a typical flat roof style but it has since been redone with a pitched roof.

An authentic glass-panelled front door leads to a hallway with its original woodwork and a built-in telephone and seating area.

 The glass-panelled front door leads to the hallway of the art deco home with its original wood-panelling

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The glass-panelled front door leads to the hallway of the art deco home with its original wood-panelling
 The hallway featuring a telephone and seating area and stairs leading up to a first-floor balcony

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The hallway featuring a telephone and seating area and stairs leading up to a first-floor balcony

Throughout the property are deep coving and skirting boards as well as solid wood panelled interior doors.

Over the crittal windows in the front reception room are decorative window pelmets featuring a classic ‘stepped’ design.

 While a television would not have been a feature in a 1930s living room, the owners have opted for a low-key piece of modern technology

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
While a television would not have been a feature in a 1930s living room, the owners have opted for a low-key piece of modern technology

There is also a tiled fireplace topped with an arched alcove.

It was common in the 1930s for the front room to be the location for entertaining guests, known as the parlour, while the rear sitting room would have been a casual space for the family to relax.

 The built in storage units show that this room is more functional than the front room

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The built in storage units show that this room is more functional than the front room
 The decorative fireplace of the front room, which is used for entertaining guests

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The decorative fireplace of the front room, which is used for entertaining guests
 Most of the furniture in the house is from the 1930s

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
Most of the furniture in the house is from the 1930s

The small kitchen was redone in the 1980s and has white cupboards with pale blue worktops.

The adjoining boiler room, side entrance hallway and pantry could all be incorporated to make a larger kitchen under the management of a new owner.

 The small kitchen may have been redone in the 80s, but could be expanded by a new owner

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The small kitchen may have been redone in the 80s, but could be expanded by a new owner

Three large bedrooms occupy the first floor of the house, with the master bedroom at the front.

Meanwhile the bathroom features original 1930s detailed green tiling, which is hard to find in any home today.

 There are three large bedrooms in the house, all with 1930s decor

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
There are three large bedrooms in the house, all with 1930s decor
 The bedrooms include traditional cittal windows and stepped pelmets

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The bedrooms include traditional cittal windows and stepped pelmets
 The owners say they are willing to sell the furniture with the house to ensure it retains its 1930s style

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The owners say they are willing to sell the furniture with the house to ensure it retains its 1930s style

The bath, which may have been replaced as it does not have the classic roll-top, has a canopy over it.

The bathroom also features a 1930s style basin and taps, ceiling coving and window pelmets.

 The bathroom features traditional ornate green tiles throughout

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The bathroom features traditional ornate green tiles throughout

The rear garden is large and there is also a lawned area at the side of the property.

There is a garage and workshop at the back of the land.

 The house has been in the same family since 1939 and hasn't changed at all

CLEE TOMPKINSON FRANCIS
13
The house has been in the same family since 1939 and hasn’t changed at all

How much value a good Sydney public school adds to your home’s price

It took Warren Buffett 20 months to sell his home – how to avoid that same fate

Warren Buffett wearing a suit and tie: Legendary investor Warren Buffett may not be smiling if he doesn’t sell his vacation home soon.

Homeowners on the West Coast typically won’t have much trouble off-loading their properties in today’s market. Unless, apparently, they’re Warren Buffett.

The iconic investor and Berkshire Hathaway  chairman struggled for more than 1.5 years to sell his home in the gated community Emerald Bay, near Laguna Beach, Calif. But he finally did so, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday — for nearly a third less than his original asking price.

Buffett purchased the house, which was built in 1936, for $150,000 in 1971 and put it on the market in February 2017 for $11 million, Bloomberg reported. Last month, he decided to lower the listing price to $7.9 million, after it continued to languish on the market.

The home sold below asking, at just $7.5 million.

The property’s listing agent declined to identify the buyer. “I feel very good about the couple who bought the house and hope their family gets as much enjoyment from it as our family did,” Buffett said in a statement following the sale.

The house has plenty of selling points, including a nearly 3,600-square-feet interior and ocean views. Some ads for the property have even played up the Buffett connection with listing photos that include his beloved Coca-Cola (KO) and The Wall Street Journal (a newspaper that’s owned by News Corp., the same company that owns MarketWatch).

So why did it take this long for a buyer to bite? There are lessons for every homeowner:

Buffett priced it too high, even for a fancy property 

For starters, it appears that Buffett stumbled on one of the most common pitfalls that can cause a home to linger on the market for much longer than anticipated: He overpriced it. The median price for homes in the same ZIP code as Buffett’s property is roughly $1.88 million, according to data from real estate firm Redfin. And homes in that area stay on the market for a median of 226 days. Homes in Emerald Bay are listed for a median price of $6.5 million, according to Realtor.com  (Realtor.com is operated by News Corp.  subsidiary Move Inc.)

So, even at the home’s new listing price of $7.9 million, it is still well above the median price for the area at a time when home prices are starting to waver across the country.

 

It’s not unusual for more expensive homes to stay on the market longer because there’s typically a smaller pool of potential buyers out there, said Daren Blomquist, senior vice president of communications at Attom Data Solutions, a real-estate data firm in Irvine, Calif. Still, the sheer length of time Buffett’s home has been up for sale suggests the list price doesn’t fit with buyers’ expectations. And the longer the house remains unsold, the more wary many buyers become.

Interest rates are on their way up, which makes buyers skittish

Other developments in recent months have also worked against high-end home sellers like Buffet though, Blomquist said. “Interest rates have ticked up,” he said. “This can really magnify the amount you’re paying. That’s one of the factors that has started to slow down some of the higher end markets.”

Additionally, the GOP-led tax reform package reduced the mortgage interest deduction and capped the property tax deduction at just $10,000. Property taxes for a multimillion-dollar home in a high-tax state like California could easily exceed that amount — and that could be making buyers more hesitant, Blomquist said.

There’s no shortage of homes for sale in Laguna Beach

Laguna Beach has also seen an increase in the number of homes on the market. Inventory there grew by 3% over the past year as of February. Nationally, home inventory has dropped 14%, according to Redfin. That makes the market more favorable to buyers, especially those in search of a bargain. In January, just 10% of properties in Buffett’s same ZIP code were sold above the list price, compared with 19% of homes nationally, according to Redfin.

 

If you’re looking to avoid some of Buffett’s mistakes, here’s what else to keep in mind.

This is what happens when homes are made permanently affordable

Community Land Trusts (CLTs) have created over 15,000 affordable homes across the country. Here’s how it works. Snoop around other homes for sale in the area — they’re your competition

If a home stays on the market too long, that alone could weigh on buyers’ minds. “They’ll think there’s something wrong with it,” Blomquist said. “That psychology builds on itself the longer it sits on the market.”

To avoid overpricing, experts suggest that sellers check what other homes in the area are selling for, and even consider asking a real-estate agent to show you the inside of those homes.

If your home isn’t selling, “Go see what they’ve got that you don’t,” said Mindy Jensen, the author of “How to Sell Your Home” and the community manager at real-estate website BiggerPockets.

In Buffett’s case, his home lacks many of the upgrades and amenities that buyers expect in Laguna Beach, Redfin (RDFN) agent Max Black told MarketWatch in March. “At a price tag of $11 million, or just over $3,000 per square foot, luxury buyers will be comparing this property to other non-oceanfront homes with more upgrades that are priced in the $2,200 to $2,400 per square foot range,” Black said.

Don’t expect prospective buyers to have too much imagination

The listing for Buffett’s home shows personal touches that Buffett likes, but non-celebrities shouldn’t stage their homes this way, Jensen said. “Buyers have no imagination,” she said. “If they walk in and see you’ve got a bright green wall, they could say, ‘I hate that, so I won’t buy this house.’” Keep paint and finishes neutral, Jensen said. A few family photos are fine, but subtlety is good.

Some cosmetic changes can also help. Even if an entire kitchen renovation isn’t realistic, smaller improvements like fixing broken door knobs, or replacing outdated hardware on cabinets are good moves.

A fresh paint job is another easy upgrade, Jensen said. For example, homes with blue bathrooms, specifically lighter shades, sold for $5,400 more than expected, according to a paint color analysis from the real estate website Zillow. “Paint is one of the cheapest things you can do to fix your house,” Jensen said.

Replacing the roof, on the other hand, isn’t likely to up the home’s value very much, relative to how much it will cost the seller.

Try some psychological warfare: Consider underpricing the home

If home sellers want to get their property off the market as quickly as they can, they’ll need to be aggressive with their pricing. And one sure-fire way of doing this is by pricing the property so it’s more affordable than other comparable listings.

Sellers should look for specific, psychological milestones when it comes to prices, Blomquist said. In other words, if the average listing price is $200,000, a seller may see more interest in the property if it’s priced at $190,000.

While this strategy is sure to speed the process along in nearly any market, in a competitive one it could also pay off — literally. “If people will flock to what they see as a bargain, they may bid up the price until it matches the desired sales price,” Blomquist said.

6 Reasons Why Pro Sports Teams Invest In Ancillary Real Estate Development Projects

As my Business of Sports students at Washington University in St. Louisdiligently prepare for their Wednesday midterm, some of the topics they are undoubtedly reviewing – or at least they better be – include:

– Stadium Economics

– Franchise Valuation

– Different Sources of Revenue Generation for Pro Sports teams.

And at the intersection of these 3 broad topics is the concept of pro sports teams making substantial real estate investments in the blocks nearest their facility.

Examples abound no matter where you look, including:

– The Chicago Cubs and the real estate development in Wrigleyville;

– The Green Bay Packers and their Titletown project;

– The Sacramento Kings and their hotel and retail developments surrounding their award-winning Golden 1 Center;

– The Golden State Warriors and their upcoming Chase Center (Fall 2019) and mixed-use development including shops and office spaces;

– The St. Louis Cardinals and their continued expansion with Phase 2 of Ballpark Village;

– The L.A. Live complex in downtown Los Angeles, just across the street from Staples Center, home to 3 separate professional sports team;

– And the new football stadium in Inglewood which will be the home to the Rams and Chargers by 2020 also has significant entertainment district encapsulated within the confines of Stan Kroenke’s soon-to-be masterpiece.

This trend of incorporating real estate investments into the larger scope of sports facility projects was inevitable for many reasons:

1. Especially with sports like baseball and football which can only utilize their facilities so many days during the season, it makes sense to build other nearby money-making assets which can be monetized 365 days a year.

2. Because of revenue sharing rules which may extract a portion of venue-related revenues, being able to generate ancillary revenues from nearby real estate developments creates a flow of monies which are shielded from sharing.

3. Because these ancillary developments boost the revenue-generating capabilities for teams, their ultimate franchise values appreciate more so than without such developments.

4. As stadium projects increasingly see a higher percentage of private money used in financing than was the case for most of the period between the 1960s through 2010, all the more reason why team owners need to think creatively and strategically when trying to maximize the financial yield produced from all developments…both inside and outside of their venue.

5. Sports facilities with nearby developments which include hotels, retail, and entertainment make the venue a more attractive destination for special one-off events…be they sporting events, concerts, conferences/conventions, etc.  When these special events are popular and newsworthy, they not only generate economic impact from visitors who travel from out of town to attend these events, but also create marketing value for the community.

6. Because the at-home viewing experience is a competitive alternative to the at-venue experience, these ancillary developments are almost seen as extra (and perhaps necessary) inducements to entice fans to “get off their couches” and make it to the stadium/arena.

In short, there is an interconnectedness between Stadium Economics, Franchise Valuations, and Generating Revenue.

For all the 6 reasons listed above, teams feel compelled to make ancillary real estate investments around their facilities.  Doing so increases their revenue yield throughout the year, and ultimately, drives franchise valuations even higher than they currently are.

 

First-time homebuyer? Here’s what you need to know

A step-by-step guide to making the biggest purchase of your life.
Image: Homeowners

My husband and I are very excited to buy a home … eventually. When will we be ready? We don’t really know. The whole process feels so incredibly vague and intimidating. The mere conversation about it tends to make us anxious and eager to postpone.

Anxiety around buying a house is common among those of us who have always rented. An August 2017 survey by loanDepot, found that though 52 percent of renting millennials are driven to buy a home, half are anxious about the costs associated with such an endeavor, and only 18 percent think it’s something they can financially pull off.

Using the 28/36 rule, which we covered here, is a great way to figure out how much you can actually afford, but money matters are only one aspect (albeit a big one) of the confusion surrounding buying your first home.

We consulted real estate and mortgage experts to compile a list of what you can expect of this complicated process, and how to manage it.

MAKE A LIST OF 10 THINGS YOU WANT

“The best thing to do, in the very beginning, is make a list of the 10 main things you’re looking for in a home and make sure to rank them or at least notate which ones are flexible,” advises Joshua D. Arcus, a broker and president of The Siderow Organization’s Residential & Commercial Divisions.

“The list could include price, location, size, renovation, views, etc.,” Arcus adds. “Knowing ahead of time that you are really looking to check as many of those boxes as possible but that some will need to be adjusted is important. And along the way you may very well come up with new things to add (and hopefully some to take off).”

If you’re moving with others, make sure they have a say in the list.

“All parties involved in the decision making process needs to be on board and on the same page when starting the process,” says Justin Moundas, a real estate agent with Douglas Elliman Real Estate. “Outline your likes/dislikes about home and/or home styles, determine your short and long term needs in terms of space, number of bedrooms, bathrooms and the potential for expansion in the future.”

GET COZY WITH YOUR CREDIT SCORE

“Know your credit score and make sure that there are no surprises/errors,” says Wendy N. Arriz, an agent with Warburg Realty. “Many people now subscribe to Experian [or another consumer credit reporting agency] and are given monthly updates on the status of their credit score. That is a great way to keep an eye on things.”

Credit Sesame’s members with a conventional mortgage have an average credit score of 682.

“If your credit needs some work, there are a few simple ways to improve it,” says Collin Brennan, managing editor at Credit Karma. “Learn more before your go to a financial institution about the three types of home loans available can help you figure out how much you need to save.”

Brennan’s pro tip: “Try to limit your [home] shopping to a 45-day window, as multiple hard-inquiries from mortgage lenders within this timeframe may be treated as just a single inquiry.”

TALK WITH A MORTGAGE BROKER OR LOAN OFFICER

Next, learn whether you pre-qualify for a mortgage by consulting a mortgage broker or loan officer.

The difference between the two: a loan officer works for the lending institution; a mortgage broker works as an independent agent for both you and the bank. The latter facilitates the loan process to choose the right lender and guide you through the whole process — and you give commission if the loan closes. A loan officer typically works on commission or salary provided by their institution.

“[They] will ask you about your savings, your income and other relevant questions, and run a credit report. If there is a second borrower, the loan officer will need to run that person’s credit, too,” says Kevin Buckthorpe, EVP, Freedom Mortgage. “Once the loan officer has all this information they’ll tell you how much you can afford and the type of loan or loans you qualify for.”

HAVE PERSONAL FINANCIAL PAPERWORK READY

Once pre-approved for a mortgage, you’ll need to have a lot of information ready to proceed with buying.

“A loan officer will ask you for as pay stubs, bank statements, tax returns, and other information that documents your financial status to complete your loan application,” says Buckthorpe. “If you want to save some time, plan ahead and prepare a file in advance with your most recent bank statements, last 3 months pay stubs, and most recent W2 or tax returns that can easily be provided to the loan officer. They’ll need all this information to underwrite your mortgage — basically, to make sure you’ll be able to pay back your loan.”

GET A REALTOR — AND BE AGGRESSIVE WITH YOUR EXPECTATIONS OF THEM

The next step, Buckthorpe notes, is to “find a real estate agent who knows the local market. Based on your pre-qualified purchase price, the agent will work with you to help you find homes that fit your budget and your needs.”

Let this realtor do the hard work for you, including negotiating.

“A good buyer’s agent will work hard to find out all details about the homes you are interested in and negotiate not only the best purchase price for you, but possibly negotiate other throw-ins like closing costs and repairs that would normally fall on their buyer,” says Brenda Di Bari, licensed associate real estate broker at Halstead in NYC. “This agent will also have the team of professionals to recommend such as a home inspector, attorney, contractor or builder, mortgage brokers of various banks who can give you quotes (maybe you can beat another bank’s interest rate offer). A great agent will also save you loads of time in searching through properties for you after having a good understanding of what you’re looking for, setting up your appointments and organizing all of the steps along the way.”

LOVE AT FIRST SIGHT CAN LEAD TO BUYER’S REMORSE

Once your realtor starts showing you homes, try to keep your competitive emotions in check. You may want to beat out other buyers immediately, but hold your horses and visit the property a second time before making an offer.

“Don’t fall in love with a home immediately,” Moundas says. “I always recommend to my clients to see a property twice before making an offer. It’s important to envision yourself in the home, in the neighborhood, etc. This helps minimize the chance for buyer’s remorse.”

A ROCK BOTTOM OFFER COULD TURN OFF SELLERS

Asking for a lower price than the house is listed at is normal in real estate, but going to low risks offending the seller past the point of compromise.

“Providing a lowball offer on a property can be insulting to the sellers,” Moundas says. “If you’re a serious buyer, work with your real estate agent to establish comparable pricing to establish a reasonable offer price. If your offer is less than asking price, have your agent provide the sellers with the rationale behind a lower offer including recently sold homes in the area, condition of the property, trends in the area, etc.”

HAVE AN INSPECTOR READY

Once you’re in final negotiations, retain a licensed inspector (again, your realtor should be able to recommend a few) to perform a home inspection. They will assess the property to size up its condition and see if it needs any repairs.

“A second or even a third inspection may be needed to determine whether the house has termites or other issues, such as mold, lead-based paint or asbestos,” says Buckthorpe. “The appraiser will view the home and determine how close the selling price is to the home’s value. Your lender will pay particularly close attention to this information.

Toronto mayoral candidate Keesmaat proposes luxury-housing tax to fund rent-to-own program

Mayoral candidate Jennifer Keesmaat brought forward a new plan Thursday for a rent-to-own housing program, a proposed solution to Toronto’s affordable housing crisis that she intends to pay for with a tax on luxury homes.

But incumbent Mayor John Tory, Ms. Keesmaat’s chief opponent, says that her “constantly combative relationship” with the provincial government makes it unlikely it will give her proposed tax its requisite sign-offs.

“I found some considerable irony in the fact that the person who says that we should be at a state of war with Queen’s Park … would be the same person who would want to go up there the next day and ask them to make a change in legislation,” Mr. Tory told reporters after giving a speech Thursday at the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

Ms. Keesmaat’s new plan is based on the 100,000 units of affordable housing she’s pledged to build in the next decade, which would be constructed with private or non-profit developers, and don’t cross over with the city’s community housing stock. Under the rent-to-own plan, individuals who submit successful applications would be able to pay monthly installments to either the city or partners, likely in the non-profit sector, as part of a rental agreement. Those monthly payments would go toward a down payment to eventually purchase the home for a set price.

Another mayoral candidate, Knia Singh, talked about developing a rent-to-own program within Toronto community housing during a recent debate.

Ms. Keesmaat’s program would be paid for with a 0.4-per-cent property surtax on luxury homes, priced at $4-million or more. She estimates that would apply to roughly 3,000 properties, bringing in around $80-million a year. So far this year, 1,576 homes have sold in the Greater Toronto area for more than $2-million, according to Toronto Real Estate Board data.

Answering questions from reporters in Toronto’s Liberty Village neighbourhood after announcing her plan, Ms. Keesmaat acknowledged the Ontario government would have to approve her surtax idea. But she said she was confident the Progressive Conservative government of Doug Ford – despite its aggressive stand against new taxes, such as Ottawa’s carbon tax – would buy into hers.

“Well, the Premier says that he is ‘for the people,’ and this is about ordinary people having access to home ownership,” Ms. Keesmaat said.

The provincial Ministry of Finance declined to comment Thursday on “hypothetical situations or platforms which may be raised by candidates in election campaigns.”

Ms. Keesmaat has vocally opposed this provincial government throughout her campaign. “This isn’t a normal provincial government that we have today,” she told the audience at a debate in Scarborough last week. Of Mr. Tory, she said: “You can’t fight conservative policies with a conservative mayor.”

Meanwhile, Mr. Tory has championed his relationships with the provincial and federal governments throughout the campaign, saying in his Board of Trade speech that he can’t be “distracted” by one politician being better in any way than another. “The Prime Minister of Canada is who it is. The Premier of Ontario is who it is. We need their partnership.”

When asked whether he’d consider vying for a similar tax as the one proposed by Ms. Keesmaat, Mr. Tory held firm to previous pledges to keep property and commercial taxes at or below the rates of inflation. “I’ve made my position on taxes clear from the beginning,” he told reporters. He would, however, consider a “rent-to-own type idea.” So far in the election, Mr. Tory has pledged to build 40,000 units of affordable housing over the next 12 years, or around 3,500 a year.